USPTO serial 77175940
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do, KR
SAMSUNG MOBILE DISPLAY CO., LTD.
GIHEUNG-GU, YONGIN-CITY, GYUNGGI-DO, KR
SAMSUNG MOBILE DISPLAY CO., LTD.
GIHEUNG-GU, YONGIN-CITY, GYUNGGI-DO, KR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D. Bruce Prout
D. BRUCE PROUT CHRISTIE, PARKER & HALE, LLPPO BOX 7068PASADENA, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | TV MONITORS; COMPUTER MONITORS; COMPUTERS; TV RECEIVERS; CATHODE-RAY TUBES; PLASMA DISPLAY PANELS; FLAT PANEL DISPLAYS IN THE NATURE OF FIELD EMISSION DISPLAYS; DIODES; MOBILE TELEPHONES; VIDEO DISPLAYS FOR MOBILE PHONES; MP3 PLAYERS; VIDEO DISPLAYS FOR MP3 PLAYERS; MP4 PLAYERS; VIDEO DISPLAYS FOR MP4 PLAYERS; PORTABLE MULTIMEDIA PLAYERS; VIDEO DISPLAYS FOR PORTABLE MULTIMEDIA PLAYERS; NAVIGATION APPARATUS FOR VEHICLES IN THE NATURE OF ON-BOARD COMPUTERS; VIDEO DISPLAYS FOR NAVIGATION APPARATUS FOR VEHICLES; DIGITAL AUDIO PLAYERS; VIDEO DISPLAYS FOR DIGITAL AUDIO PLAYERS; ULTRA-MOBILE PCs; AND VIDEO DISPLAYS FOR ULTRA-MOBILE PCs | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 16, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 23, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 31, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 14, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 14, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 21, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |