CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for OLED MAX

USPTO serial 77175946

OLED MAX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HOLTZ, ALLISON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OLED MAX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

D. Bruce Prout

David A. Plumley CHRISTIE, PARKER & HALE, LLPP.O. Box 29001GLENDALE, CA 91209-9001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009TV MONITORS; COMPUTER MONITORS; COMPUTERS; TV RECEIVERS; CATHODE-RAY TUBES; PLASMA DISPLAY PANELS; FLAT PANEL DISPLAYS IN THE NATURE OF FIELD EMISSION DISPLAYS; DIODES; MOBILE TELEPHONES; VIDEO DISPLAYS FOR MOBILE PHONES; MP3 PLAYERS; VIDEO DISPLAYS FOR MP3 PLAYERS; MP4 PLAYERS; VIDEO DISPLAYS FOR MP4 PLAYERS; PORTABLE MULTIMEDIA PLAYERS; VIDEO DISPLAYS FOR PORTABLE MULTIMEDIA PLAYERS; NAVIGATION APPARATUS FOR VEHICLES IN THE NATURE OF ON-BOARD COMPUTERS; VIDEO DISPLAYS FOR NAVIGATION APPARATUS FOR VEHICLES; DIGITAL AUDIO PLAYERS; VIDEO DISPLAYS FOR DIGITAL AUDIO PLAYERS; ULTRA-MOBILE PCs; AND VIDEO DISPLAYS FOR ULTRA-MOBILE PCsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 14, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 14, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 8, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2011EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 13, 2011EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 13, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 15, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 14, 2011EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 12, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 12, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 18, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 15, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 15, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 20, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 17, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 24, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 24, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 23, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 16, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 14, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 14, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 14, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 14, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 20, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 31, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 16, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 15, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 11, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 5, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 4, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 1, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 31, 2008GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 31, 2008GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 31, 2008CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
May 14, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 14, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 14, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 14, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 14, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 24, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 23, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 23, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 28, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 11, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance