USPTO serial 77175949
DYNAMIC WAREHOUSING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MURRAY, DAVID T
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DYNAMIC WAREHOUSING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leonora Hoicka
Leonora Hoicka INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY - TrademarksN CASTLE DRARMONK, NY 10504Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware; servers, namely, computer servers, communications servers, and intranet servers; storage devices, namely, flash drives and high-speed storage subsystems for storage and backup of electronic data either locally or via a telecommunications network; computer software for use in controlling the operation and execution of computer systems, programs and networks; computer software for use in connecting disparate computer systems, servers and storage devices that exist within an information technology environment; computer programs for use in database information storage, retrieval, analysis and transaction processing; computer software for use in database management and data analytics; and manuals sold as unit therewith | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | printed matter, namely, manuals, presentation materials, teaching materials in the field of computer hardware and computer software for managing hardware, software, databases and processes that exist within an information technology environment | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Custom installation, repair and maintenance of computer hardware | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer consulting services; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing computer hardware and troubleshooting of computer software problems; computer software and hardware design for others; integration of computer systems and networks, namely, integration of computer hardware and software; testing of software and hardware products for others; installation, maintenance, and updating of computer software for others; computer programming for others; computer consulting services in the field of computer hardware and computer software for managing hardware, software, databases and processes that exist within an information technology environment; and computer systems analysis | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by International Business Machines Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by International Business Machines Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DYNAMIC WAREHOUSING
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 3, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 28, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 4, 2012 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 9, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 31, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 30, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 2, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 4, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 12, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 22, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 2, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |