Drawing for BORDEAUX

USPTO serial 77176237

BORDEAUX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARROLL, DORITT
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BORDEAUX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard A. Flynt

Richard A. Flynt ROYLANCE, ABRAMS, BERDO & GOODMAN, L.L.P.1300 19TH ST NW STE 600WASHINGTON, DC 20036-1649UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009semiconductors; computer software to enhance the audio-visual capabilities of multimedia applications, namely, for the integration of text, audio, graphics, still images and moving pictures; computers; laptop computers; computer monitors; optical disc drives; computer printers; computer mouse; personal digital assistants (PDA); DVD players; MP3 players; compact disc players; headphones; television sets; telephones; dry cells; battery chargers; electric irons; cash registers; video cameras; camcordersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 18, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 18, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 7, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 7, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 7, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 15, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 29, 2008ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Nov 15, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 26, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 7, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 7, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 31, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 31, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 26, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 14, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance