USPTO serial 77176296
XTRALIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 12, 2013
- Examiner
- BOONE, JOHN C
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with XTRALIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NASSAU, BS
NASSAU, BS
NASSAU, BS
GARRETT THERMAL SYSTEMS LIMITED
BRACKNELL, BERKSHIRE, GB
Nassau, BS
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter S. Sloane
Peter S. Sloane Leason Ellis LLPOne North Lexington Ave., Suite 1200White Plains, NY 10601-1523United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic air pollution monitoring equipment comprised of [ air pollution monitors, ] airborne particle detectors, gas detectors, chemical-hazard detectors, smoke detectors, and fire detectors; Smoke detection monitors; [ Active fire suppression and extinguishing equipment comprising water sprinklers, water misting systems, chemical clean agents, inert gases, and the sub-systems used to control, actuate, and monitor such equipment, namely, actuators, monitors, and suppression release devices; ] Gas detectors and the systems used to control and monitor such equipment; [ Flame detectors and the systems used to control and monitor such equipment; Electronically controlled fire alarm systems comprised of computer hardware, software, electronic controls, and input and output devices, namely, fire alarm control panels and environmental monitoring and control panels; Electronically controlled fire prevention systems comprising fire-suppressive and fire-preventative gas agents and total flooding agents to reduce hypoxic oxygen; Electronic devices for use in security and surveillance and for use in the monitoring and control of security systems, namely, cameras, monitors, alarms, digital video and audio recorders, alarm panels, input and output devices, displays, control panels, and software used to control and monitor such apparatus; Apparatus for recording or reproducing sounds and images; Apparatus for recording, producing, or transmitting of security or surveillance data; Voice notification and evacuation alarm equipment and systems comprising amplifiers, speakers, controllers, displays, control panels, paging panels, audio input panels, multiplexors, mixers, and the networks used to allow these devices to intercommunicate data and audio information; Amplifiers, namely, voice transmitting apparatus, speakers, microphones, digital amplifiers, electric amplifiers, sound amplifiers, image amplifiers, and audio induction loop amplifiers; Anti-intrusion alarms and perimeter protection systems; Access control equipment and systems comprising card and biometric readers, door control equipment, and video and infrared image analyzers; ] Passive infrared detectors; [ Electronically operated remote speed sensing apparatus; Remote speed recorders and indicators; Vehicle traffic data acquisition systems and apparatus comprised of microwave, radar, ultrasonic, and passive infrared sensors; Speed checking apparatus for vehicles; Vehicle counting and detector systems used for vehicle detection, counting, and length and height determinations for the classification of vehicles, comprised of microwave, radar, ultrasonic, and passive infrared sensors; Detectors for use in traffic management systems and intersection control systems for detecting vehicles such as bicycles, cars, vans, lorries, trucks, and buses; Apparatus for remotely metering vehicle speed; Parts for the foregoing products; ] Computer [ hardware and ] software used to control and monitor all the foregoing equipment and systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by XTRALIS TECHNOLOGIES LTD
- Other trademarks owned by XTRALIS TECHNOLOGIES LTD
- Other trademarks owned by XTRALIS TECHNOLOGIES LTD
- Other trademarks owned by GARRETT THERMAL SYSTEMS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by VFS Technologies Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named XTRALIS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 15, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2023 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2023 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 14, 2023 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 15, 2023 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2023 | PUM1 | OFFICE ACTION ISSUED POU1 | — |
| Feb 16, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 30, 2023 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2019 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2019 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 6, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 29, 2019 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 13, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 13, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 11, 2013 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 31, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 20, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2012 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 3, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2012 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 10, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 7, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 26, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 5, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 3, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 19, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 11, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 16, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 8, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 24, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 11, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 23, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |