USPTO serial 77176715
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Louisville, CO
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
V. Craig Belair
Varen Craig Belair Susan E. Billheimer, Deborah M. Lodge, George M. B2550 M Street, N.W.Washington, DC 20037UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Broadband and narrowband communication services onboard aircrafts to enable users to transmit and receive voice, video, and data within the aircrafts, between the aircrafts, between the aircrafts and the ground, and between the ground and the aircrafts; Broadband and narrowband communication services to interconnect users, located onboard an aircraft, with users located onboard another aircraft, to interconnect users located onboard an aircraft with users and destinations on the ground, to interconnect users and destinations on the ground with users onboard the aircrafts, and to interconnect users located onboard an aircraft | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2012 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |