Drawing for MOTIVATE SYSTEMS

USPTO serial 77177118

MOTIVATE SYSTEMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MOTIVATE SYSTEMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CHRISTOPHER J DAY

CHRISTOPHER J DAY LAW OFFICE OF CHRISTOHPER DAY301 E BETHANY HOME RDSTE A-213PHOENIX, AZ 85012

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042COMPUTER SOFTWARE CONSULTATION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT; DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF SOFTWARE; CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF OFFICE AND WORKPLACE AUTOMATION; DATA AUTOMATION AND COLLECTION SERVICE USING PROPRIETARY SOFTWARE TO EVALUATE, ANALYZE AND COLLECT SERVICE DATA FOR USE IN MONITORING COMPUTER SYSTEM RESOURCES AND ASSISTING IN THE ADMINISTRATION OF COMPUTER RESOURCESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 22, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 22, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 21, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 28, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 8, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 20, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 19, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 25, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 25, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 25, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 25, 2008CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 22, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 9, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 9, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 9, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 7, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 15, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance