USPTO serial 77177175
1906
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with 1906?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan E. Moskin
Jonathan E. Moskin Foley & Lardner LLP90 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | alcoholic beverages, except beers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lubelskie Zaklady Przemyslu Spirytusowego POLMOS S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Lubelskie Zaklady Przemyslu Spirytusowego POLMOS S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named 1906
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 24, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 20, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 5, 2012 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 2, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 28, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 17, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 20, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 8, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 21, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 3, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |