USPTO serial 77177374
LIVE!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LIVE!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles F. Jacobs
Charles F. Jacobs Cordish & Cordish601 E. Pratt Street, 6th FloorBaltimore, MD 21202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail outlets featuring clothing, gifts, sporting goods and equipment, food, drugs, cosmetics, perfumes, furniture, computers, and computer goods, musical recordings, housewares, linens, shoes and electronics; business management in the field of shopping centers, retail shopping outlets, marketplaces, residential facilities, hospitality facilities, commercial facilities, office facilities, entertainment facilities, restaurants and bars; art galleries | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Shopping center services namely rental of shopping center space; real estate management in the field of shopping centers, shopping outlets, marketplaces, residential facilities, hospitality facilities, commercial facilities, office facilities, entertainment facilities, restaurants and bars; leasing of buildings or portions thereof; leasing of residences; leasing of office space; leasing of commercial space; leasing of hospitality facilities and real estate acquisition services in the field of condominiums; real estate listing services | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Commercial, office, hospitality and residential development of land and facilities, namely, planning and laying out of residential, office, hospitality and commercial communities, areas and buildings; construction services, namely, construction of residential, office, hospitality and commercial communities, areas and buildings; consulting in the area of real estate construction | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services namely night clubs, live performance by musical bands and singers; karaoke clubs; comedy clubs; puppet or animation theaters; operating motion picture theaters, live performance theaters, dinner theaters, amusement arcades, providing virtual reality entertainment facilities; family recreation facilities, museums, health club facilities for fitness and exercise, casinos; providing mixed-use entertainment facilities for night clubs, live performance by musical bands and singers, karaoke clubs, comedy clubs, puppet or animation theaters, operating motion picture theaters, live performance theaters, dinner theaters, amusement arcades, providing virtual reality entertainment facilities, family recreation facilities,museums, health club facilities for fitness and exercise or casinos | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Restaurants; lounges; bar services; sports bars, hotel services, spa services, namely, providing temporary accommodation and meals to clients of a health or beauty spa; resort lodging services; providing of food and drink; coffee shops; bistros;catering; provisions of meeting or exhibition, conference and convention facilities | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Live! Holdings, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Live! Holdings, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named LIVE!
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 6, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 14, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 14, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 6, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 13, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 13, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | ICNA | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2009 | IULN | ITU LETTER MAILED, NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 10, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 4, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 4, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 5, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 13, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 27, 2008 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 27, 2008 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 27, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 27, 2008 | ZZAX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE WITHDRAWN-TIMELY AAU | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | PBIC | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - INCOMING CORR RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 14, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |