USPTO serial 77177567
HERBAL AQUA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3459829Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 1, 2008
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HERBAL AQUA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Beverly Hills, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Camille M. Miller
Camille M. Miller COZEN O'CONNOR1900 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-3527UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | nutrionally fortified water and vitamin enriched water | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | May 21, 2008 |
| 032 | drinking water, aerated water, mineral water, soda water, carbonated water, non-carbonated water, table water; fruit-flavored carbonated or noncarbonated drinking water | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | May 21, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2008 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2008 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 28, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 27, 2008 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 24, 2008 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 24, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 23, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 23, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 29, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 6, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 21, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |