Drawing for ENABLED BY HIWIRED SMART TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 77177585

ENABLED BY HIWIRED SMART TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ENABLED BY HIWIRED SMART TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elisabeth A. Langworthy

Elisabeth A. Langworthy Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP1275 Pennsylvania Ave, NWWashington, DC 20004-2415UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE, NAMELY, COMPUTER SOFTWARE THAT ASSESSES AND GENERATES REPORTS REGARDING THE SECURITY, PERFORMANCE AND CONNECTIVITY OF COMPUTER HARDWARE, COMPUTER NETWORKS, AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE THAT INTEGRATES AND MANAGES INTERNET PROTOCOL TELECOMMUNICATIONS FUNCTIONS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN MONITORING THE USE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS AND FACILITATING CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT; COMPUTER SOFTWARE THAT ENABLES USERS TO ACCESS AND RECEIVE INTEGRATED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT SERVICESACTIVE—
042COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, NAMELY, CONSULTING REGARDING THE INSTALLATION, IMPLEMENTATION AND USE OF COMPUTER NETWORKS, COMPUTER HARDWARE, COMPUTER SOFTWARE, WIRELESS MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS DEVICES AND NETWORKS, DIGITAL CAMERAS, AND DIGITAL MUSIC PLAYERS; CONSULTING IN THE FIELDS OF DATA RECOVERY AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SECURITY; PROVIDING AND MANAGING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SECURITY SOFTWARE, SYSTEMS AND FIREWALLS; MONITORING, MANAGING AND ASSESSING COMPUTER AND ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS; COMPUTER SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY, TROUBLESHOOTING PROBLEMS CONCERNING COMPUTER HARDWARE, COMPUTER SOFTWARE, AND ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKSACTIVE—
045monitoring, managing, and assessing the performance and security of computer and electronic communications networksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 27, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 21, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 21, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 22, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 22, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 22, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 9, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 9, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 9, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 9, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 18, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 18, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 16, 2009FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 2, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 24, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 14, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 14, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 14, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 14, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 22, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 22, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 22, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 25, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 23, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 16, 2007MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
May 15, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance