Drawing for NX 6000

USPTO serial 77177970

NX 6000

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHARPER JR, SAM
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with NX 6000?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew R. Mowers

MATTHEW R. MOWERS BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C.1000 TOWN CENTER, 22ND FLOORSOUTHFIELD, MI 48075-1238UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Headsets for cell phones and telephones; wireless cell phone and telephone ear piece; headsets for use with computers, amplifiers for telephone and computer headsets; interface units for telephone and computer headsets and parts for all of the aforesaid goods; hands-frees kits comprised of microphone, earphones and headset adapters; hearing instrument components, namely, integrated circuits and computer chipsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 26, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 26, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 28, 2010CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 28, 2010CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 7, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 7, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 7, 2010CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 7, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 18, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 18, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 2010ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2009CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 14, 2009CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 24, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 24, 2009CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 23, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 23, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 20, 2009ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2008CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 20, 2008CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 7, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 7, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 25, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 28, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 7, 2008CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 6, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 4, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 3, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 3, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 24, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 23, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 23, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 23, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 17, 2007MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
May 16, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance