USPTO serial 77178277
MODERN THINKING CLASSIC PERFORMANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4089342Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 24, 2012
- Examiner
- DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MODERN THINKING CLASSIC PERFORMANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scot A. Duvall
SCOT A. DUVALL MIDDLETON REUTLINGER401 S. FOURTH AVENUE2500 BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOWERLOUISVILLE, KY 40202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Distribution of mutual fund shares; investment management and consultation services; securities investment services on behalf of corporate investors; securities, commodity and investment advisory services; transfer agency services rendered to issuers of investment securities; investment advice and analysis | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AGF Management Limited
- Other trademarks owned by AGF Management Limited
- Other trademarks owned by AGF Management Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named MODERN THINKING CLASSIC PERFORMANCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 24, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 16, 2011 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 15, 2011 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Dec 15, 2011 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 30, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 4, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 9, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 6, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 20, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 20, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 28, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 24, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |