USPTO serial 77179877
WALLLINKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WALLLINKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard Y. Kim
RICHARD Y. KIM MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP600 13TH ST NW STE 1200WASHINGTON, DC 20005-3096UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Removable and non-removable decorative and non-decorative wall covering systems comprised of wall tiles, wall panels not of metal, wall boards, non-metal wall-mounted panels featuring a adhesive pads and wall mounting members | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 14, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 9, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 28, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2007 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |