USPTO serial 77180137
WATERMARK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AQUILA, STEPHEN DAVID
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WATERMARK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Walter Batt
WALTER BATT THE LAW OFFICE OF WALTER B. BATT9935 SANTA MONICA BLVD.BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212-1606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, conducting parties | ABANDONED | May 1, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 13, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 5, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 16, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |