Drawing for BETTERSEX.MOBI

USPTO serial 77180231

BETTERSEX.MOBI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OKEKE, BENJAMIN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BETTERSEX.MOBI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan Freya Olive

SUSAN FREYA OLIVE OLIVE & OLIVE, P.A.PO BOX 2049500 MEMORIAL STREETDURHAM, NC 27702-2049

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Online retail store services and catalog ordering services featuring body and beauty care preparations, body lotions, massage oils, shavers and shaving products, personal lubricants, anesthetics for non-surgical use, adult sexual aids, toys and games, temporary tattoos, condoms, and audio, visual, and multi-media recordings featuring adult entertainment or information in the field of human sexualityACTIVE—
038Mobile media and entertainment services in the field of electronic transmission of entertainment media content and specifically excluding entertainment services in the nature of continuing television game show featuring competitions between competitors of different genderACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 23, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 23, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 20, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 20, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 20, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 21, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 28, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 8, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 26, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 25, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 19, 2009AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2009PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2009ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 27, 2009PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Feb 17, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 16, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 16, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 16, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 16, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 16, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 13, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 12, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 12, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 10, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 12, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 23, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 23, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 22, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 1, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 5, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 31, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 27, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 18, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 17, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance