Drawing for JUMP JUMP JELLY REACTOR

USPTO serial 77180675

JUMP JUMP JELLY REACTOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MITTLER, ROBIN M
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JUMP JUMP JELLY REACTOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lynne E. Graybeal

LYNNE E. GRAYBEAL PERKINS COIE LLP1201 3RD AVE STE 4800SEATTLE, WA 98101-3099UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Interactive game software; computer game software; downloadable interactive, computer, video and electronic game programs; video game programs and cartridges; electronic game programs; game software for use on any computerized platform, including game consoles, televisions, hand-held electronic devices, electronic entertainment devices, telecommunications devices, mobile phones, electronic communication devices and personal digital assistant devicesABANDONED—
041Entertainment services, namely, providing on-line interactive, computer, video and electronic games; providing interactive, computer, video and electronic games through computer networks, television networks, or other telecommunications networks; providing on-line information and content in the field of games, interactive game content, electronic game content, computer game content or video game content; providing temporary use of non-downloadable interactive games, electronic games, computer games or video gamesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 12, 2008MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Mar 12, 2008ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Mar 3, 2008EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 16, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 2, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 2, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 15, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 2, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 2, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 2, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 2, 2007GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 2, 2007GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 2, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 19, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 17, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance