USPTO serial 77181580
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark H. Tidman
MARK H. TIDMAN ARENT FOX LLP1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5303UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software; computer software supplied and/or downloadable from a computer database, the Internet or other electronic network; computer software for messaging via the Internet; computer software for creation and management of messages and notifications; computer software providing notification services; computer software providing a user with computer-based services at a specific time; computer software providing a user with entertainment services; computer software providing graphical animations; computer software providing audio and/or video playback capability; computer software for organisational management; computer software for management of communication and communication networks; computer software for managing data storage; downloadable electronic publications; downloadable electronic games; downloadable audio content; downloadable video content | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Advertising and promotion services; advertising services provided via the Internet; marketing services; marketing services provided via the Internet; business information services; publication of publicity text; market research services; information and advisory services relating to all the aforesaid services | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications services; telecommunications services provided via the Internet; messaging services; messaging services provided via the Internet and/or via mobile communications links; providing access to audio and video content from a database, the Internet, or other electronic network; delivery of audio and video content by telecommunications; broadcasting services; television and radio broadcasting services; information and advisory services relating to all the aforesaid services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 22, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 31, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 22, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |