Drawing for WE HEAR SONGS

USPTO serial 77181720

WE HEAR SONGS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EULIN, INGRID C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WE HEAR SONGS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Natasha Shabani

Natasha Shabani RUTTER HOBBS & DAVIDOFF INC.1901 AVENUE OF THE STARSSUITE 1700LOS ANGELES, CA 90067

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services, namely, providing a web site featuring original musical compositions, music industry tools, information about the commercial music industry, and music reviews by music industry professionals who evaluate music uploaded by the public, rate and comment upon it, and assess its potential artistic and commercial value for established companies in the music industryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 8, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 7, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 3, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 3, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 3, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 25, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 25, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 25, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 5, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 13, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 24, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 10, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 10, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 10, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 10, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 10, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 10, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 7, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 28, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 19, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 18, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance