USPTO serial 77182087
INVENTURING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORENO, PAUL A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INVENTURING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory S. Bernabeo
Gregory S. Bernabeo Saul Ewing LLPCentre Square West1500 Market Street, 38th FloorPhiladelphia, PA 19102-2186Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | business consultation services, namely, business management, development and advisory services provided to entrepreneurs, start-up businesses and ongoing businesses, particularly those in the field of aerospace-related developments; business consultation services in the field of developing, managing and/or commercializing intellectual property assets; marketing consultation, namely providing assistance in product and/or technology commercialization; and providing business and market analysis and assessment of new technologies and innovations for others for the purpose of commercialization | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | research and development services relating to new products of others; engineering consulting services, technology consultation services and technical research in the field of aerospace engineering; and conducting of feasibility studies regarding technical projects of others, particularly those in the field of aerospace engineering | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | licensing of intellectual property, namely licensing of developed technologies and innovations to others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lift-Off Technologies Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Lift-Off Technologies Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named INVENTURING
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 24, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 11, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 21, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 27, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 18, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 30, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |