USPTO serial 77182262
ANGEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRYE, KIMBERLY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ANGEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brett A. North
BRETT A. NORTH GARVEY, SMITH, NEHRBASS & NORTH, L.L.C.3838 NORTH CAUSEWAY BOULEVARD THREE LAKEWAY CENTERSUITE 3290METAIRIE, LA 70002Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer and telecommunication items, equipment, hardware, software, and/or accessories, namely, computer keyboards; recorded computer operating programs; computer peripherals; computers; personal computers; printers for use with computers; data processing apparatus in the nature of data processors; microprocessors; data storage units in the nature of flash, CD, DVD, and floppy drives, disk drives, data reader devices in the nature of bar code readers, data storage and reader devices in the nature of RFID readers, computer mice; microphones, headphones; headsets for telephones; PC cameras; LCD and CRT monitors in the nature of computer monitors and television monitors; optical disk drives; computer power supplies; LAN networking products, namely, LAN access points for connecting network computer users; computer's add-on cards, namely, blank smart cards; multimedia products, namely, multimedia projectors; notebook computers; personal digital assistants; apparatus and instruments for conducting, switching, transforming, accumulating, regulating or controlling electricity, namely, electricity conduits, electricity adaptors, voltage regulators for electric power, electric switches; blank magnetic data carriers; automatic vending machines; mechanism for coin-operated apparatus, namely, coin changers, coin sorting machines, parking meters; cash registers, calculators, computers; fire-extinguishers; downloadable computer software supplied from the Internet for data mining; downloadable electronic publications provided on-line from database or the Internet, namely, newsletters in the fields of business, computers, and gaming; computer software to enable searching of data; protective clothing; life jackets; telephones; mobile telephones; telephone apparatus in the nature of telephone recorders, telephone headsets, and telephone terminals; electronic personal organizers; smart cards, in the nature of blank smart cards, encoded smart cards containing programming for business programming and electronic game programs; electronic organizers incorporated within telecommunications apparatus and equipment, namely, electronic personal organizers sold as a component of mobile telephones; computer software and modems for establishing connections between a database and the Internet; casings for personal computers and casings for server computers; PCBs in the nature of motherboards, video display cards; modems; Internet set top boxes; storage devices, namely, flash drives; electrical power supplies in the nature of uninterruptible power supply; scanners; printers; computer mouse; headsets for use with telephones and computers; telephones; caller ID telephones; cordless telephones; digital telephones; recording telephones; and normal telephones | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 11, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 4, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 4, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 9, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 6, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |