USPTO serial 77182435
DESIGNER WEIGHT CONTROL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSTER, STEVEN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DESIGNER WEIGHT CONTROL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tex Prows
Bernard L. Kleinke Duckor Spradling Metzger & Wynne3043 4th AvenueSan Diego, CA 92103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Under Section 1(a)--Nutritional supplement preparations, namely protein supplement beverages and protein supplement beverage concentrated powders for use as a supplement drink mix, namely, prepackaged individual serving protein supplement beverage concentrated powders, bulk packaged protein supplement beverage concentrated powders, and multi-packs of prepackaged individual serving protein supplement beverage concentrated powders; and nutritional supplements in the form of protein supplement concentrated syrups for addition to other drinks, namely, prepackaged individual serving protein supplement beverage concentrated syrups, bulk packaged protein supplement beverage concentrated syrups, and multi-packs of prepackaged individual serving protein supplement beverage concentrated syrups | ACTIVE | Apr 26, 2007 |
| 029 | Based upon intent to use in commerce--Milk-based beverages containing protein; mixes for making milk-based beverages containing protein consisting of concentrated powders, namely, prepackaged individual serving concentrated powders, bulk packaged concentrated powders, and multi-packs of prepackaged individual serving concentrated powders; and mixes for making milk-based beverages containing protein consisting of concentrated syrups, namely, prepackaged individual serving concentrated syrups, bulk packaged concentrated syrups, and multi-packs of prepackaged individual serving concentrated syrups | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Based upon intent to use in commerce---Beverages made of coffee and containing protein; beverages made of tea and containing protein; cocoa-based beverages containing protein; chocolate food beverages not being dairy-based or vegetable-based containing protein | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Based upon intent to use in commerce--Non-alcoholic beverages containing protein, namely carbonated beverages, non-carbonated beverages in the nature of drinking waters, juice based beverages in the nature of fruit juice based beverages and vegetable juice based beverages, and malt beverages; concentrated powders and syrups for making the above beverages, namely, prepackaged individual serving concentrated powders and syrups, bulk packaged concentrated powders and syrups, and multi-packs of prepackaged individual serving concentrated powders and syrups | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 20, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 1, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 6, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |