Drawing for MSPOT REMIX

USPTO serial 77182964

MSPOT REMIX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HALMEN, KATHERINE E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MSPOT REMIX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Heather A. Dunn, Esq.

Heather A. Dunn, Esq. DLA Piper LLP US555 Mission St, 24th FlSan Francisco, CA 94105UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer software for wireless transmission and synchronization of audio, video, data, and multimedia files, and audio, video, data, and multimedia streams between a computing device and a cell phone, mobile computer, or other mobile device; downloadable computer software for creating and managing a database of audio, video, data, and multimedia files, and audio, video, data, and multimedia streams; downloadable computer software for playing, annotating, sharing, and broadcasting audio, video, data, and multimedia files, and audio, video, data, and multimedia streams on a cell phone, mobile computer, or other mobile deviceACTIVE—
038Streaming of audio, video, and multimedia materials via the internet and telecommunications networks to mobile devicesACTIVE—
042Providing on-line non-downloadable software for wireless transmission and synchronization of audio, video, data, and multimedia files, and audio, video, data, and multimedia streams between a computing device and a cell phone, mobile computer, or other mobile device; providing on-line non-downloadable software for creating and managing a database of audio, video, data, and multimedia files, and audio, video, data, and multimedia streams; providing on-line non-downloadable software for playing, annotating, sharing, and broadcasting audio, video, data, and multimedia files, and audio, video, data, and multimedia streams on a cell phone, mobile computer, or other mobile deviceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 26, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 1, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 28, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 5, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 16, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 2, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 30, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 27, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 26, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 26, 2008COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 24, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 24, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 24, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2007GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 31, 2007GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 31, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 28, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 22, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 21, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance