Drawing for JOHN A. DERMODY

USPTO serial 77183064

JOHN A. DERMODY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VANSTON, KATHY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with JOHN A. DERMODY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lauri S. Thompson

Lauri S. Thompson Greenberg Traurig, LLP3773 Howard Hughes ParkwaySuite 500NLas Vegas, NV 89169

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Building construction, repair, and renovation services; Construction consultation servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 14, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 14, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 14, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 13, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 4, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 10, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 4, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 4, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 4, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 4, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 4, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 4, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 4, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 28, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 21, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance