Drawing for SDG<10

USPTO serial 77183174

SDG<10

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PINO, BRIAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SDG<10?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas F. Dunn

THOMAS F. DUNN MORSE, BARNES-BROWN & PENDLETON, P.C.1601 TRAPELO RD STE 205WALTHAM, MA 02451-7340UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Golf apparatus, golf practice apparatus, golf training aids, and golfing articles, namely, golf bags, with or without wheels, trolley bags for golf equipment, stands for golf bags, caddie bags for golf clubs, golf bag travel covers, golf clubs, golf irons, golf putters, golf club heads, golf club shafts, gold club handles, covers for golf bags, covers for golf clubs, golf club grips, hoods, covers and protectors for golf club heads, golf balls, golf ball markers, golf ball retrievers, golf ball spotters, golf putting practice mats, golf tees, golf tee bags, divot repair tools, golf gloves, golf board games, coin-operated golf video games, arcade golf games, stand alone golf video game machines, golf swing alignment aid in the nature of target laser and lights, nets for practicing golf, portable golf driving ranges, and golf practice apparatus and training aids in the nature of nets, driving and putting mats, and cagesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 16, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 15, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 14, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 21, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 1, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 17, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 16, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 13, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 3, 2009DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Feb 20, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 20, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 20, 2009ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 18, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 18, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 18, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 1, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 31, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 31, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 22, 2007MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
May 21, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance