USPTO serial 77183466
DERME.CA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PILARO, MARK F
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DERME.CA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
St-Laurent (Quebec), CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN ABELMAN, FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 THIRD AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10017-5621UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Non-Medicated cosmetic and skin care products, namely, milks, cleansers, deep pore cleansers, exfoliants, masks, perfumes, treatment for the rejuvenation of skin and hair, extract, namely, extracts for skin care, hair care and skin rejuvenation, body lotions, night cream, day cream, hand creams, eye creams, active creams, hydrating creams, anti-aging creams, serums, moisturizing lotions, toners, concentrating scalp treatments, hair products, namely, shampoos, conditioners, and gelatin based products for hair care, make-up, namely, make-foundation, eye shadows, blushes, and lipsticks, peels, gels, frozen serums, skin treatments in the nature of creams, lotions and compounds for skin cleansing, rejuvenation and care, soaps, body scrubs, sun care products, namely, sunscreens, bath products, namely, bath oils, bubble bath, bath crystals and bath gels, gels, creams, lotions and serums to combat cellulite, emulsion oils, essential oils, foam mask, cream mask, foot care products, namely, creams, lotions, gels, serums, compounds and oils; personal deodorant | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Nutraceuticals, namely, food and dietary supplements, namely, vitamins, minerals, and meal replacement bars; ampoules sold with nutraceutical ingredients for the maintenance and rejuvenation of hair and skin and for the prevention and treatment of skin and hair deterioration and similar conditions | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Education services, namely, teaching and conducting classes, seminars, conferences and workshops in the field of healthcare, physical fitness, medical esthetics, cosmetic surgery, hairstyling, fashion consultation, make-up application, massage, exercise, nutrition, wellness | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Health spa services, namely, facial, hair, skin and body treatments, manicure and pedicure services, body waxing, massage; beauty salon; nutrition service center, namely, nutrition analysis and counseling services; anti-aging advice and consultation; medical testing services, namely, skin evaluation, and blood evaluation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by 4233891 CANADA INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named DERME.CA
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 24, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 29, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 28, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 8, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 7, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 31, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |