USPTO serial 77183552
MEEMO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HWANG, JOHN C B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MEEMO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sabrina C. Stavish
SABRINA C. STAVISH SHERIDAN ROSS P.C.1560 BROADWAY STE 1200DENVER, CO 80202-5145UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | ELECTRONIC MAIL SERVICES; ELECTRONIC MAIL ALERTS; ELECTRONIC MAIL FORWARDING SERVICES; INSTANT MESSAGING SERVICES; ELECTRONIC MESSAGE SENDING; ELECTRONIC MAIL FOR MOBILE DEVICES; MOBILE PUSH ELECTRONIC MAIL SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 28, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 19, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |