USPTO serial 77183804
MASTERCARD MONEYSEND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4154273Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 5, 2012
- Examiner
- COOPER, CHRISTINE H
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MASTERCARD MONEYSEND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MasterCard International Incorporated
Purchase, NY
Other trademarks owned by MasterCard International Incorporated
MasterCard International Incorporated
Purchase, NY
Other trademarks owned by MasterCard International Incorporated
MasterCard International Incorporated
Purchase, NY
Other trademarks owned by MasterCard International Incorporated
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Colm J. Dobbyn
COLM J. DOBBYN MASTERCARD INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED2000 PURCHASE STPURCHASE, NY 10577-2509UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financial services in the nature of personal banking and money transfer services in the nature of web-based money transfers provided by means of a global computer network; Providing monetary payment services to consumers and businesses via a global computer network in the nature of person to person, person to business and business to business payments; Electronic financial clearing house services; Electronic payment, namely, electronic processing and transmission of bill payment data; stored value electronic purse services, namely, providing on-line stored value accounts in an electronic environment; providing electronic funds and currency transfer services; electronic payment services for personal banking in the nature of electronic funds transfer and financial clearinghouse services via a global computer network; electronic bill payment; clearing and reconciling financial transactions via a global computer network; person-to-person and person-to-business money transfer services transacted by means of a computer network; bill payment remittance services; electronic transfer of money from customer to customer; cheque verification services; the provision of financial information for the support of retail services provided on-line, through networks or other electronic means using electronically digitized information, in the nature of bill remittance and payment data; electronic bill payment services provided through a website; on-line banking; financial services in the nature of web-based money transfer provided over the telephone and by means of a global computer network or the internet | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 1, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MasterCard International Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by MasterCard International Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by MasterCard International Incorporated
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named MASTERCARD MONEYSEND
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 5, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 3, 2012 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2012 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 28, 2012 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 30, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 24, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2011 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 16, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 5, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 10, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 6, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2010 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 20, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 27, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 1, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |