USPTO serial 77183848
NANOCOLLEGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3900921Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 4, 2011
- Examiner
- KAJUBI, ELIZABETH N
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NANOCOLLEGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Research Foundation of State University of New York, The
Albany, NY
Other trademarks owned by Research Foundation of State University of New York, The
Research Foundation of State University of New York, The
Albany, NY
Other trademarks owned by Research Foundation of State University of New York, The
Research Foundation of State University of New York, The
Albany, NY
Other trademarks owned by Research Foundation of State University of New York, The
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David L. Principe
David L. Principe PHILLIPS LYTLE LLP125 Main StreetOne CanalsideBUFFALO, NY 14203-2887Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing and headwear, namely, t-shirts, shirts, sweatshirts, jackets, sweaters, hats and scarves | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 27, 2006 |
| 035 | Economic development services, namely, promoting business in the area of nanotechnology, nanobiology, nanoengineering, nanoscience, nanoeconomics and nanoelectronics | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 27, 2006 |
| 041 | Providing educational services, namely, providing college level instruction and training to students in the fields of nanotechnology, nanoscience, nanoengineering, nanobioscience and nanoeconomics | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 27, 2006 |
| 042 | Providing scientific and technical research and development services in the fields of nanotechnology, nanoscience, nanoengineering, nanobioscience and nanoeconomics | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 27, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Research Foundation of State University of New York, The
- Other trademarks owned by Research Foundation of State University of New York, The
- Other trademarks owned by Research Foundation of State University of New York, The
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named NANOCOLLEGE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 2, 2017 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - POWER OF ATTORNEY ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 27, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 30, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 2, 2010 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 1, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 23, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2009 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 14, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 29, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 6, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 16, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 31, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 30, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 29, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |