USPTO serial 77183969
SYNCREA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SYNCREA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Evan A. Raynes, Esq.
EVAN A. RAYNES, ESQ. FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, L.901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4432UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat; fish not live; food products made from fish and shellfish, namely, fish cakes, fish croquettes, fish sticks, and fish dumplings; processed meat; processed beans; preserved, dried, and cooked fruits and vegetables; processed frozen fruits and vegetables; jellies; eggs and processed eggs; edible oils and fats; soups; preparations for making soup; preparations for making stew or bouillon; fermented beans; fried soybean curd; soybean curd frozen and then dried; jelly made from devil's tongue root; soybean milk; tofu; protein being foodstuffs for human consumption; whey-based food beverages; milk and milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; skim milk powder and egg powder | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Curry; curry spice; pasta sauces; coffee; cocoa; tea; seasonings; sugar; salt; mustard; vinegar; sauces for pasta and noodles; sauces; spices; honey; rice; husked oats; husked barley; flour for food; gluten for food; processed cereals; cereal preparations, namely, processed cereals; noodles; pasta; boiled and dried noodles; pre-cooked frozen foods, namely, frozen breads, frozen pasta, frozen meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice; prepared entrees consisting primarily of rice or pasta; dumplings; sandwiches; sushi; hamburger sandwiches; pizzas; boxed lunches, namely, hot dogs sandwiches and rice-based bento; hot dog sandwiches; meat pies; ravioli; candy; bread; crackers; biscuits; buns; cakes; pies; cookies; preparations for making instant cakes, cookies, or puddings; preparations for ice creams or sherbets; ice creams; sherbets; batter mix, namely, dry blend of flour; almond paste; yeast powder; yeast; baking powder; natural or artificial ice; meat tenderizers; sake cake; food starch; breader mix, namely, flour based bread crumb or cracker meal; tempura batter mix, namely, batter mix for making tempura; breadcrumbs; tapioca; sago; artificial coffee; pastry and confectionery, namely, candy | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nisshin Seifun Group Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Nisshin Seifun Group Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named SYNCREA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 21, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 19, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 19, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 13, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 21, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 9, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 18, 2008 | ICNA | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 21, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 5, 2008 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 2, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |