Drawing for SKYPRO

USPTO serial 77184393

SKYPRO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SKYPRO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ELLEN P. WINNER

ELLEN P. WINNER GREENLEE, WINNER AND SULLIVAN, P.C.STE 2004875 PEARL EAST CIRBOULDER, CO 80301-6103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Development of cost and performance models, namely, cost analysesACTIVE
042Design and process engineering services, namely, assessment of customer needs and integration and design of solar systems for use of solar-generated steam in existing power plants; measurement evaluations in the field of solar energy power generation through the use of solar measuring stations; design for others in the field of solar energy power plants; design and operation of solar field control/data acquisition systems, namely, computer software design for othersACTIVE
045Permitting, namely, obtaining environmental, design, zoning and other governmental permits for development projectsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 26, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 25, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 30, 2008DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Oct 22, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Oct 22, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Oct 21, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Oct 21, 2008DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Oct 21, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 21, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 22, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 29, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 9, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 21, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 21, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 13, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 13, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Nov 13, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Nov 13, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Nov 13, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Oct 26, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 26, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 26, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 3, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 3, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 3, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 24, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
May 23, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance