Drawing for RFID FOR A GLOBAL WAREHOUSE

USPTO serial 77184620

RFID FOR A GLOBAL WAREHOUSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROACH, APRIL K
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RFID FOR A GLOBAL WAREHOUSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey B. Sladkus

Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq. Jeffrey B. Sladkus, LLC1827 Powers Ferry RoadBuilding 6, Suite 200Atlanta, GA 30339

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software that utilizes data transmitted from wireless endpoint devices to monitor, manage, track and locate fixed and mobile assets including vehicles, trailers, heavy equipment, containers, railcars, and other fleet vehiclesACTIVE—
038Wireless communication services, namely, transmission of data via terrestrial and satellite systems and communication services, namely, using terrestrial and satellite systems for transmitting voice, data, location and alarm information for end usersACTIVE—
042Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software that enables the location and tracking of items through the use of terrestrial and satellite systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 16, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 16, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 15, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 11, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 11, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 18, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 18, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 12, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 20, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 31, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 31, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 15, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 15, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 13, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 31, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 31, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 30, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 23, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance