USPTO serial 77184727
DURA-LITE CHARGE AIR COOLERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOLTZ, ALLISON
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DURA-LITE CHARGE AIR COOLERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roger P. Furey
ROGER P. FUREY KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP1025 THOMAS JEFFERSON ST., NWEAST LOBBY, SUITE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20007-5201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | AUTOMOTIVE AND DIESEL ENGINE PARTS, NAMELY, OIL COOLERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 6, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 1, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 2007 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |