USPTO serial 77185204
SAFE PRODUCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWERS, ALEXANDER L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SAFE PRODUCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bryan G. Pratt
Bryan G. Pratt Dorsey & Whitney LLP111 South Main Street, Suite 2100IP DepartmentSalt Lake City, UT 84111-2176Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | Fresh vegetables and fruits, namely, Apple, Apricot, Avocado, Banana, Blackberry, Blackcurrant, Blueberry, Currant, Cherry, Cherimoya, Date, Durian, Eggfruit, Fig, Feijoa, Gooseberry, Grape, Grapefruit, Huckleberry, Jackfruit, Jambul, Kiwi fruit, Kumquat, Lemon, Lime, Lychee, Mango, Melon, Cantaloupe, Honeydew melon, Watermelon, Nectarine, Orange, Peach, Pear, Plum/prune (dried plum), Pineapple, Pomegranate, Raspberry, Western raspberry (blackcap), Rambutan, Redcurrant, Salal berry, Satsuma, Strawberry, Tangerine, Tomato, Watermelon--see melon, and Ziziphus mauritiana; Vegetables, namely, fresh packed or processed Broccoli, Brussels sprout, Cabbage, Cauliflower, Kale, Rapini, Kai-lan, Bok choy Komatsuna, Mizuna greens, Oriental mustard, Amaranth, Arugula, Bitterleaf, Catsear, Celtuce, Ceylon spinach, Chicory, Chinese Mallow, Chrysanthemum, Corn salad, Cress, Dandelion, Endive, Epazote, Fat hen, Fiddlehead, Fluted pumpkin, Golden samphire, Good King Henry, Iceplant, Kuka, Lagos bologi, Land cress, Lettuce, Lizard's tail, Melokhia, Mustard, New Zealand Spinach, Orache, Radicchio, Samphire, Salad rape, Sea beet, Seakale, Sierra Leone bologi, Soko, Sorrel, Spinach, Summer purslane, Swiss chard, Watercress, Water spinach, Winter purslane, Armenian cucumber, Eggplant, Avocado, Bitter melon, Caigua, Cayenne pepper, Chayote, Chile pepper, Cucumber, Globe Artichoke, Luffa, Malabar gourd, Marrow, Parwal, Perennial cucumber Pumpkin, Snake gourd, Sweetcorn, Sweet pepper, Tinda, Tomato, Tomatillo, Watermelon, Winter melon, West Indian gherkin, Zucchini, American groundnut, Azuki bean, Black-eyed pea, Chickpea, Drumstick, Dolicho, bean, Fava bean, French bean, Guar, Horse gram, Indian pea, Lentil, Lima bean, Moth bean, Mung bean, Okra, Pea, Peanut, Pigeon pea Rice bean, Runner bean, Soybean, Tarwi, Tepary bean, Urad bean, Velvet bean, Winged bean, Yardlong bean, Asparagus, Cardoon, Celeriac, Celery, Elephant Garlic, Florence fennel, Garlic, Kohlrabi, Kurrat, Leek, Nopal, Onion, Prussian asparagus, Rhubarb, Shallot Welsh onion, Wild leek, Ahipa, Arracacha, Bamboo shoot, Beetroot, Black cumin, Broadleaf arrowhead, Canna, Carrot, Cassava, Chinese artichoke, Daikon, Earthnut pea, Ensete, Ginger, Gobo, Hamburg parsley, Jerusalem artichoke, Jícama, Lotus root, Maca, Malanga, Mashua, Mauka, New Zealand rock lily, Oca, Parsnip, Pignut, Plectranthus, Potato, Prairie turnip, Radish, Rutabaga, Salsify, Scorzonera, Skirret, Taro, Ti, Tigernut, Turnip, Ulluco, Wasabi, Water chestnut, Yacón, Yam, Aonori, Carola, Dabberlocks, Dulse, Hijiki, Kombu, Mozuku, Nori, Ogonori, Sea grape, Sea lettuce, and Wakame, in International Class 31 | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 28, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 1, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 1, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 1, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 30, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |