Drawing for COMPASSION

USPTO serial 77185729

COMPASSION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KIM, YONG OH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COMPASSION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bart A. Lazar

Bart A. Lazar Seyfarth Shaw LLP131 South Dearborn StreetSuite 2400Chicago, IL 60603

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Banana chips; bean dip; blanched nuts; candied nuts; dairy-based dips; dips; fruit chips; hummus; potato chips; potato crisps; processed nuts; roasted nuts; candied nuts; shelled nuts; processed meat; snack dips; snack mix consisting primarily of processed fruits, processed nuts and/or raisins; soy chips; vegetable chips; yucca chips; snack mix comprised primarily of processed nuts, processed edible seeds and candyACTIVE—
030Candy; candy coated popcorn; caramel popcorn; cheese flavored puffed corn snacks; puffed corn snacks; extruded corn snacks; corn-based snack foods; cheese flavored snacks, namely, cheese curls; cheese flavored snacks, namely, puffed cheese balls; puffed rice snacks; cheese sauce; corn chips; flour-based chips; glazed popcorn; grain-based chips; grain-based food bars also containing nuts, fruit and/or chips; pita bread; pita chips; salsa; popcorn; popped popcorn; pretzels; processed popcorn; snack mix consisting primarily of crackers, pretzels, candied nuts and/or popped popcorn; corn chips; taco chips; tortilla chipsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 16, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 16, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 12, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 20, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 30, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 15, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 15, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 8, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 8, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 8, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 5, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 5, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2007GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 7, 2007GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 7, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 1, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 24, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance