USPTO serial 77186024
SMARTERKEYS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROBERTSON, DEIRDRE G
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMARTERKEYS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sherry H. Flax
SHERRY H. FLAX SAUL EWING LLP500 E PRATT STBALTIMORE, MD 21202-3133UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for facilitating keyboard shortcuts and providing easy access to multimedia computer functions for creating IRC-styled commands allowing the user to create keyboard shortcuts to create multi-color and formatted text, organize the instant message window into one interface, text recall, chat logging, sound commands, filtering, operating system management, font color and fading effects, and creating font waving effects | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Information Appliance Associates, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Information Appliance Associates, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named SMARTERKEYS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 11, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 28, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 25, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 29, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 29, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 25, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 26, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 6, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 6, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |