CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for CHURCH CAFÉ COMPANY THE COMPANY THAT GIVES BACK.

USPTO serial 77186147

CHURCH CAFÉ COMPANY THE COMPANY THAT GIVES BACK.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHURCH CAFÉ COMPANY THE COMPANY THAT GIVES BACK.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas Lizzi, Esq.

THOMAS LIZZI, ESQ. IP & INTERNET LAW NORTH, LLCP.O. BOX 38ZELIENOPLE, PA 16063UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030CoffeeACTIVE—
036Charitable fund raisingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 13, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 12, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 10, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 16, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 26, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 26, 2008COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 26, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 3, 2008PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Aug 25, 2008PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jun 27, 2008PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jun 17, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 11, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 11, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 11, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 11, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 11, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 3, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 3, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 3, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 2, 2008DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Apr 30, 2008GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Apr 30, 2008GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Apr 30, 2008CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Mar 21, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 19, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 29, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 1, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 25, 2007MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
May 24, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance