USPTO serial 77186166
MAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KHAN, ASMAT A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hamilton HM 11, BM
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karol A. Kepchar, Esq.
KAROL A. KEPCHAR, ESQ. AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP1333 NEW HAMPSHIRE AVE NW STE 400WASHINGTON, DC 20036-1564UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Insurance services, namely, writing property and casualty insurance and reinsurance; life, health and annuity insurance underwriting; specialty insurance underwriting, namely, property catastrophe reinsurance, aviation reinsurance, marine reinsurance, and energy reinsurance underwriting; and excess and surplus insurance services, namely, property, inland marine, casualty, excess liability and umbrella insurance underwriting | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2010 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 7, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 4, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 7, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |