USPTO serial 77186534
PEARLY BAY JUST FOR THE FUN OF IT!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FISHER, HANNAH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PEARLY BAY JUST FOR THE FUN OF IT!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Apolzon
LAWRENCE E. APOLZON FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017-1822UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | wines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 21, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 23, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 3, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |