Drawing for HAIRWORKS

USPTO serial 77186632

HAIRWORKS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HAIRWORKS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven R. Gursky, Mary L. Grieco, Safia A. Anand

Steven R. Gursky, Mary L. Grieco, Safia A. Anand Olshan Grundman Frome Rosenzweig & Wolosky LLP65 East 55th StreetNew York, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003non-medicated shampoo, non-medicated hair conditioner, hair gel, hair care lotions, hair care creams, and hair sprayACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 22, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 17, 2009ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 17, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 31, 2009EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Feb 13, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 13, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Dec 19, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Nov 10, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 10, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 10, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 11, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 10, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 21, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 21, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 19, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 29, 2007AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jun 29, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 21, 2007PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
May 24, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance