Drawing for RED CARPET MOMENT SURVIVAL KIT

USPTO serial 77186874

RED CARPET MOMENT SURVIVAL KIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BOULTON, KELLY F
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RED CARPET MOMENT SURVIVAL KIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard H. Zaitlen

RICHARD H. ZAITLEN PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP725 S FIGUEROA ST STE 2800LOS ANGELES, CA 90017-5406UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics, namely, nail care preparations, nail buffing preparations, nail polish, nail polish base coat, nail polish remover, nail polish top coat, face powder, blusher, cosmetic pencils, eye shadow, lip gloss, lipstick, lip pencils, body and beauty care cosmeticsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 1, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 1, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 30, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 5, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 30, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 25, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 25, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 25, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 25, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 25, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 5, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 4, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 4, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 5, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 5, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 5, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 15, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 10, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 10, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 10, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 10, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 10, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 11, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 25, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance