Drawing for PARROT BOOMBOX

USPTO serial 77187514

PARROT BOOMBOX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STEIN, JAMES W
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PARROT BOOMBOX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jill Anderfuren

JILL ANDERFUREN MARSHALL, GERSTEIN & BORUN LLP233 S. WACKER DRIVE6300 SEARS TOWERCHICAGO, IL 60606-6357

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for wireless content delivery, Apparatus for wireless transmission of acoustic and visual information, namely computer software for wireless content delivery, wireless Hi-Fi speakersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 28, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 28, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 24, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 1, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 12, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 29, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 27, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 17, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 16, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 16, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2009GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Jul 15, 2009GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
Jul 15, 2009CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jun 19, 2009AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2009PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 29, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 29, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 23, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 23, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 23, 2008ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2008GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 30, 2008GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 30, 2008CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 8, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 8, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 3, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 28, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 28, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 9, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 31, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 30, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance