USPTO serial 77187636
FLEUR BLEUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLAIR, JASON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FLEUR BLEUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GEORGE W. LEWIS
GEORGE W. LEWIS JACOBSON HOLMAN PLLC400 7TH ST NW STE 600WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2218UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SUNGLASSES | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | HANDBAGS, TOTE BAGS, PURSES, KNAPSACKS AND BACKPACKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | LADIES' APPAREL AND ACCESSORIES, NAMELY SWEATERS, BLOUSES, JACKETS, PANTS, BLAZERS, SKIRTS, SKORTS, SHIRTS, DRESSES, SHORTS, VESTS, TURTLENECKS, POLO SHIRTS, SWEATSHIRTS, SWEAT PANTS, SWEAT SUITS, PONCHOS, DENIM PANTS, DENIM SHIRTS, DENIM JACKETS, SOCKS, SCARVES, HATS, CAPS, GLOVES AND TIES; FOOTWEAR, NAMELY SHOES, BOOTS, SANDALS AND SLIPPERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 21, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 3, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 3, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |