Drawing for INTELLIPROSPECTING

USPTO serial 77188293

INTELLIPROSPECTING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LORENZO, KATHLEEN H
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with INTELLIPROSPECTING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Frank J. Martinez, Esq.

FRANK J. MARTINEZ, ESQ. THE MARTINEZ GROUP PLLC55 WASHINGTON ST STE 323BROOKLYN, NY 11201-1070UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing consumer marketing information in the field of credit list services, namely, providing credit information derived from a consumer's credit history and current credit profile reviewed and compiled with respect for compatibility with a credit provider's products.; Creative marketing design services; Marketing consultation in the field of marketing response capture, analysis and reporting in defined trade and target criteria for multi-channel credit services marketing campaignsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 19, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 19, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 10, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 29, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 29, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 16, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 16, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 16, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 16, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 12, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 12, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 12, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 11, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 31, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 30, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance