USPTO serial 77188803
KINGZ 1
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KINGZ 1?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CORPUS CHRISTI, TX
CORPUS CHRISTI, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel S. Polley
DANIEL S POLLEY DANIEL S POLLEY PA1215 E BROWARD BLVDFORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33301-2133UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Musical sound recordings; musical video recordings; downloadable video recordings featuring music; downloadable audio recordings featuring music; musical audio recordings; pre-recorded cd's, video tapes, laser disks and dvd's featuring music; prerecorded digital video disks featuring music; video discs featuring music; video recordings featuring music; video recordings and audio visual recordings featuring music and animation and live performances by a musical group; audio recordings featuring music; sound recordings featuring music; prerecorded dvds and prerecorded compact disks featuring music; prerecorded dvds and prerecorded compact disks featuring recorded live performances by a musical group; pre-recorded musical sound recordings; downloadable music recordings via the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, live performances and appearances by a musical group and live performances and appearances by a musical artist; providing entertainment services in the nature of audio and visual performances, namely, live musical group performances; entertainment, namely, live performances by a musical group; live musical entertainment, namely, musical group performances; live musical concerts, namely, musical group performances; live musical performances by a group; live musical performances by a musical artist; providing non-downloadable prerecorded and live music online; providing non-downloadable prerecorded and live musical video online; providing non-downloadable prerecorded and live musical audio online; providing non-downloadable prerecorded and live interviews of musical artists online; providing entertainment services, namely, indoor and outdoor live performances by a musical band; entertainment services, namely, indoor and outdoor live performances by a musical artist; music composition for others; music production services; online entertainment rendered by a musical band, namely, providng a web site featuring musical performances, musical videos, related film clips, photographs, and other multimedia materials and band information | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 7, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 5, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 19, 2012 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 21, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 29, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 23, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 8, 2007 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 8, 2007 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 8, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 6, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |