USPTO serial 77189223
CIN CIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENJAMIN, SARA NICOLE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CIN CIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kristen M. Walsh
Kristen M. Walsh Nixon Peabody LLP1100 Clinton SquareRochester, NY 14604UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | body and beauty care preparations, namely-- lip balm; mouthwash; hydrating gels and creams; night creams; night gels; eye gels; hand creams; hand lotions; body lotions; massage lotions; massage oils; body, face, and foot scrubs; non-medicated foot soaks; foot gels; foot lotions; fragrance oils for personal use; natural essential oils; mineral soaks; body wash, body powders; skin cleaners; skin toners, exfoliant creams, gels, and skin moisturizers; skin care masks; eye creams; hair shampoos; hair conditioners; hair gels; hair sprays; hair mousses; skin soaps; hand soap, liquid soaps for hands, face, and body; shower gels; bath gels; bath powders; bath additives, namely, soaks, cleansers, and moisturizers for personal use; bath salts, bath crystals; mineral baths, namely, mineral salt in the nature of bath salts not for medical purposes; bubble baths; bath oils; shaving lotions; shaving creams; shaving gels; scented body oils; sun screen preparations; sun block preparations; self-tanning preparations; sun tanning lotions; skin bronzers; skin balms; skin fresheners; after-sun preparations; moisture creams, lotions and mists in the nature of moisturizing body sprays; skin cleansing gels; spa preparations, namely, body lotions; creams, namely, deep tissue skin and eye creams; gels, namely, bath and aloe gels for cosmetic purposes; skin care preparations, namely, mud treatments; body scrubs and butters; sugar scrub; body buff, namely, bath gel combined with jojoba beads; pedicure scrub; salt glow, namely, salt combined with massage oil; sugar glow, namely, sugar combined with massage oil; milk bath, namely, buttermilk combined with essential oils; eye pads, namely, liquid filled plastic pads for therapeutic purposes; peeling gommage, namely, skin creams and oils for cleansing and rehydration; avocado essential oil, creamy facial and body cleaners, cleansing facial gel, hydrating face crème, lip mask, lip scrub, foot salts, foot scrub, bath bombs, bath fizzies in the nature of bath salts, deep cleansing sea green clay facial mask | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 24, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 26, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 25, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 25, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 24, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |