USPTO serial 77189494
AVENELLE COURT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, JANICE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AVENELLE COURT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Cotton ball dispensers; Boxes for dispensing paper towels; Dispensers for paper towels; Rails and rings for towels; Rails and rings for towels, not of precious metal; Towel bars; Towel holders; Towel racks; Towel rails and rings; Towel rails and rings, not or precious metal; Towel rings; Trash cans; Trash containers for household use; Toothbrush holders; Ceramic tissue box covers; Toilet tissue holders; Dispensers for liquid soap; Plastic molds for household use in making soap; Soap boxes; Soap brackets; Soap containers; Soap dishes; Soap dispensers; Soap holders; Soap holders and boxes; Wall soap dishes; Drinking cups; Drinking flasks; Drinking flasks; Drinking vessels | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 9, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 10, 2007 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 9, 2007 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2007 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2007 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |