USPTO serial 77190247
VIRTUAL NETWORK ADMINISTRATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIRTUAL NETWORK ADMINISTRATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian J. Goree
BRIAN J. GOREE LATHAM, STALL, WAGNER, STEELE & LEHMAN, P.C.1800 S. BALTIMORESPIRIT TOWER, SUITE 500TULSA, OK 74119Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer colocation services, namely, providing facilities for the location of computer servers with the equipment of others; Computer consultation; Computer monitoring service which tracks hardware performance and processes and sends out historical reports and alerts; Computer network design for others; Computer project management services; Computer services, namely monitoring and reporting on the performance, availability, and errors of websites of others; Computer services, namely, computer system administration for others; Computer services, namely, data recovery services; Computer services, namely, filtering of unwanted e-mails; Computer services, namely, hosting and maintaining an online website for others to manage and maintain computer networks; Computer services, namely, remote and on-site management of electronic messaging systems and applications for others; Computer site design; Computer software consultation; Consultation services in the fields of selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; Consulting services in the field of office and workplace automation; Customization of computer hardware and software; Design and development of networks; Design of computer networks and software for others for the small and medium business market; Installation of computer software; Integration of computer systems and networks; Maintenance of computer software; Monitoring the computer systems of others for technical purposes and providing back-up computer programs and facilities; Planning, development and technical support of electronic communications networks; Technical support, namely, monitoring of network systems; Technical support, namely, providing back-up computer programs and facilities; Technological consultation in the technology field of computer network and systems integration; Up-dating of computer software; Updating of computer software for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 10, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 14, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |