USPTO serial 77191032
ELITEXC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINK, GINA M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ELITEXC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sharon R. Gold
SHARON R. GOLD TROY & GOULD PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION1801 CENTURY PARK E STE 1600LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-2318UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | video game software in the fields of sports and entertainment, especially featuring martial arts, mixed martial arts, fights, fighters and athletes; video game cartridges and discs; computer game cartridges; digital video discs, digital versatile discs, laser video discs and CD-ROMs, all featuring sporting events, competitions, games, and programming in the area of mixed martial arts, martial arts, and fighting | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | clothing and wearing apparel, namely, shirts, hats, caps, visors, warm-up suits, sweatsuits, sweatshirts, sweatpants, jogging suits, running shorts, workout pants and shorts, workout tops, tee shirts, tank tops, sleepwear, pajamas and loungewear, shorts, underwear, bandanas, swimming and bathing suits, wrist bands, blouses, pants, jackets, athletic uniforms, referee and officiating uniforms, sweaters, turtlenecks, mittens and gloves, jerseys, rain ponchos and jackets, long-sleeved shirts, jackets, jeans | ACTIVE | Feb 10, 2007 |
| 041 | entertainment services, namely, organizing and producing sporting events and competitions in the area of martial arts and mixed martial arts; entertainment services, namely, live stage shows and performances featuring sports, martial arts, and mixed martial arts; production of entertainment shows and events in the area of martial arts, fighting, and mixed martial arts for distribution via television, cable, satellite, audio and video media cartridges and discs, computer discs and other electronic means, mobile telephones and other mobile devices with and without telephony functionality and via global computer networks; production and distribution of entertainment and sports shows and related news and information programs via global communication networks; educational services, namely, providing information on the subject of sports and entertainment, namely, all aspects of mixed martial arts and fighters, including competitions, events, fighter rankings, fighter backgrounds, and fighting strategies; providing a website on global computer networks featuring information on the subject of sports and entertainment | ACTIVE | Dec 15, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ProElite, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ProElite, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named ELITEXC
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 22, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 25, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 20, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 25, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 19, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 22, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 22, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 29, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 9, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 6, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |