Drawing for NANOSILICON

USPTO serial 77192428

NANOSILICON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CASTRO, GIANCARLO
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NANOSILICON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Everett E. Fruehling

EVERETT E. FRUEHLING CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON KINDNESS1420 FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 2800SEATTLE, WA 98101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Parts and accessories for automobiles, namely, wiper blades for automobiles, windshield wipers for automobiles, and windshield wipers for front-glass automobilesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 11, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 11, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 9, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 7, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 7, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 7, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 13, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 23, 2011NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 4, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 1, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 1, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 1, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 1, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 14, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 3, 2011ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2011GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2011GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2011CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jun 28, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 28, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 12, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 12, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 22, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 20, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 25, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 25, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 19, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 19, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 2, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 30, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 30, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 7, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 7, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 7, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 6, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 6, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jun 5, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance